Your cart is empty
Begin with one of our most-loved collections and find a piece made for you.
Shop best sellers- Made to order in Surat
- Insured international delivery
- Secure Shopify checkout
Added:
Cart Error
Drawer menu
Your cart (0)
Begin with one of our most-loved collections and find a piece made for you.
Shop best sellers
Russia has decided that a laboratory-grown stone may not be sold as a diamond. Government Resolution No. 657, adopted on 30 May 2026 and in force from 1 September, strips the word from tags, labels and product descriptions across Russian retail and puts "synthetic" in its place. If you are buying a ring in Ohio or Ontario, the legal effect on you is precisely nothing. The interesting part was never the law. It is who asked for it, and what that tells you about the state of the trade.
The resolution amends Russia's rules for the retail sale of goods made from precious metals and gemstones. From 1 September 2026, jewellery containing a grown stone must carry the word "synthetic" on its label, an approved abbreviation permitted, and the ordinary shop word for a cut diamond may not be applied to it at all.
English coverage tends to flatten a nuance here. Russian carries two words where English has one: one for the mineral itself, another for the finished, faceted gem you buy across a counter. It is the second, the shop-floor word, that has been withdrawn. A grown stone may still be described by reference to the mineral, provided it is qualified as synthetic and as cut, which is why trade reports give the compliant formulation as "cut synthetic diamond". What it cannot do is borrow the word every Russian buyer uses to mean a finished gem.
The rule reaches past terminology. Consumer-facing information about synthetic stones set in precious metal may not use "precious", "real", "genuine", "natural", "mined", "mineral" or "eco-friendly", nor similar expressions and derivatives. Colour and quality descriptors associated with natural diamonds are barred too, which strips the grading shorthand off the ticket, and weight must be stated in grams rather than carats. Russia's deputy finance minister, Alexey Moiseev, presented the package as a matter of transparency and consumer protection, which is what governments say.
One carat is one-fifth of a gram. A stone that a jeweller anywhere else would call 1.50 carats becomes, on a Russian ticket, 0.30 g. Nothing about the stone has changed. The vocabulary of comparison has. Set that beside the ban on colour and clarity descriptors and the label cannot easily be read against the case next door, which is either the point or a very convenient side effect.
Russia is not alone in reaching for grams. On 25 May 2026, after a summit in Freetown, the African Diamond Producers Association resolved that the 4Cs and carat weight be reserved for natural stones, and that grown material be measured in grams or kilograms and identified as synthetic. The ADPA speaks for fifteen producing countries and roughly seventy per cent of the world's rough output. Two very different institutions reached for the same instrument within days of each other.
Alrosa. The company mines around ninety per cent of Russia's diamonds, and it is not a private actor in any ordinary sense: the Russian Federation holds a third of the shares through its property agency, while the republic of Yakutia and its municipal districts hold a third more between them. Alrosa carried the measure on its own newsroom under a headline announcing that only natural stones may be called diamonds. That is not the posture of a company caught unawares.
The commercial backdrop is not subtle. Alrosa has traded under EU sanctions and G7 import restrictions since the start of 2024, its routes to Western buyers narrowed, while grown stones have taken a large and still-growing share of what Russian shops stock. A rule that makes the competing product harder to name, harder to grade and harder to compare on a shelf is a useful thing for an incumbent to be handed. Its supporters also point to the decision by the Gemological Institute of America, from October 2025, to stop applying the 4Cs to grown stones, which is a fair thing to point at even if it was taken for quite different reasons.
It would be lazy of us to pretend the argument has no merit. Unambiguous language is a real consumer good, and our end of the trade has not always covered itself in glory. On 13 May 2026 the United Kingdom's Advertising Standards Authority upheld complaints against two lab-grown retailers whose advertising failed to qualify the word "diamond" clearly or prominently at the moment a shopper first met it. That is not Russian protectionism. That is a British regulator finding that buyers were being left to assume.
India reached a similar destination by a gentler route. IS 19469:2025, adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards as a modified version of the international standard ISO 18323 and in force since January 2026, reserves the unqualified word "diamond" for natural stones, permits "laboratory-grown diamond" or "laboratory-created diamond", and forbids the flattering vocabulary that grew up around them, including "pure", "cultured", "earth-friendly" and "conflict-free". France has insisted since a decree of January 2002, which the finance ministry confirmed in late 2023 it would not amend, on diamant synthétique or diamant de synthèse. Note what those two have in common and Russia does not: the word survives, with a qualifier attached. Whether "synthetic" is neutral description or slur is an argument the trade body CIBJO has been having with itself for years, and we will leave it there.
| Where | Instrument | May the word "diamond" appear? |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | Resolution No. 657, from 1 September 2026 | No. Shop word withdrawn; label reads "synthetic", weight in grams |
| India | IS 19469:2025 (BIS), from January 2026 | Yes, qualified: "laboratory-grown" or "laboratory-created" |
| France | Decree of 14 January 2002, confirmed 2023 | Yes, qualified: diamant synthétique or diamant de synthèse |
| UK and US | ASA rulings; FTC Jewelry Guides | Yes, but never bare: a clear, prominent qualifier is required |
So the principle is close to universal, and the disagreement is about degree. Russia has simply chosen the strictest degree available.
Legally, nothing. Russian retail rules govern Russian retail. In the United States the Federal Trade Commission removed the word "natural" from its definition of a diamond in the 2018 Jewelry Guides, so a grown stone is a diamond as far as the definition goes, but the word may not be used bare: it needs a clear and conspicuous qualifier saying the stone did not come from a mine. In the United Kingdom the Advertising Standards Authority requires a prominent qualifier and accepts "laboratory-grown", "laboratory-created" or "synthetic". In Canada, jewellery advertising sits under the Competition Act. None of that shifts because Moscow rewrote a ticket.
One practical lesson is worth taking. The noun on a website is the weakest evidence you will ever be offered, in either direction. The strong evidence is documentary: an independent laboratory report, and a report number laser-inscribed on the girdle so that certificate and gem cannot drift apart. That is checkable under a loupe. No adjective is. Our guide to IGI certification explains what the report records and how to read it, and our comparison of lab-grown and natural stones sets out what actually differs between them, which is less than the marketing on either side would like.
We call them lab-grown diamonds. We put it in the product title rather than a footnote, and we have never sold a mined stone, so there is nothing for us to be coy about. The description is accurate, and every regulator whose market we sell into permits it with disclosure, which we give unprompted. We would rather a customer knew exactly what she was buying in the first sentence than discovered it in the small print.
The honest position includes the parts that do us no favours. Grown stones sell for a fraction of what mined ones fetch, and prices have kept falling; if you are buying one as a store of value, you are buying the wrong object, and we would rather say so plainly than let a Russian resolution say it for us. What a grown stone does offer is the same material, at a size most people could not otherwise reach, with a supply chain we can actually account for.
Everything we make is cut, set and finished at our own bench in Surat, made to order for the person who ordered it, in solid 9ct to 18ct gold, never plated and never vermeil. Every stone is IGI-certified with its report number inscribed on the girdle, and we ship to the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada with import duties prepaid, usually around two weeks door to door. If you would rather see what that looks like in the hand than in a regulation, our lab-grown diamond jewellery is a quiet place to begin, and we are glad to answer the awkward questions.
No. Resolution No. 657 is a labelling rule for Russian shops, not a finding about physics. A lab-grown diamond is chemically and optically the same material as a mined one, which is why the US Federal Trade Commission removed the word "natural" from its own definition of a diamond back in 2018. Russia has changed what sellers may print on a ticket, not what the stone is.
Government Resolution No. 657 was adopted on 30 May 2026 and applies from 1 September 2026. It amends Russia's rules for the retail sale of goods made from precious metals and gemstones, so it bites at the point of sale inside Russia. As of August 2026 we have seen no reporting that it has been extended to wholesale trade or export documentation.
Not at all. Russian retail rules apply to Russian retail. American sellers follow the FTC Jewelry Guides, British advertising is policed by the Advertising Standards Authority, and Canadian claims fall under the Competition Act. All three permit "lab-grown" or "laboratory-created" provided the origin is disclosed clearly and prominently, and none of that is changed by anything Moscow has done.
One carat equals one-fifth of a gram, so a 1.50 carat stone becomes 0.30 g on the ticket. Set alongside the ban on colour and clarity descriptors, the effect is that a grown stone cannot easily be compared with a mined one on a shelf. The African Diamond Producers Association adopted a comparable grams-for-synthetics position on 25 May 2026, so the idea is not unique to Russia.
In the United Kingdom the Advertising Standards Authority accepts "laboratory-grown", "laboratory-created" or "synthetic", and insists the qualifier appears prominently in the advertisement itself rather than only on the linked website. In the United States the FTC removed "natural" from its definition of a diamond in 2018, but the bare word still may not be used for a grown stone: it needs a clear and conspicuous disclosure that the stone did not come from a mine.
No, and the difference matters. IS 19469:2025, a modified adoption of ISO 18323 in force since January 2026, reserves the unqualified word "diamond" for natural stones but still permits "laboratory-grown diamond" and "laboratory-created diamond", while banning flattering terms such as "pure", "cultured", "earth-friendly" and "conflict-free". France takes a similar line. Russia is stricter: it withdraws the shop word entirely.